› Forums › PUBLIC UNITED STATES › PENNSYLVANIA › WESTMORELAND COUNTY › FBI REPORT CORRUPTION FOR CRIMES IN DIVORCE
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 months, 1 week ago by Deborah.
February 18, 2023 at 9:37 am #1491Deborah
F.B.I. PUBLIC CORRUPTION COMPLAINT
To: Federal Bureau of Investigation
From: Deborah A. Bujdos
F.B.I. PUBLIC CORRUPTION COMPLAINT
RE: COMPLAINT RE:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA COURT OFFICIALS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN HIGH
ASSET DIVORCE THIS CASE HAS DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF BRIBERY AND PUBLIC
CORRUPTION/ ALTERING TRANSCRIPTS / PERJURY AND SUBORNING PERJURY
DOCKET TAMPERING/ WITNESS INTIMIDATION/ DENYING THE PLAINTIFF THE RIGHT TO
A FAIR TRIAL, OR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD. Etc.
DEFENDANTS: Defendants: Are All from Westmoreland County, PA, Court of Common Pleas
a. Judge Harry Smail/ crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
b. Judge Christian Scherer/ crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
c. President Judge Richard Mc Cormick / crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
d. Master Eric Bononi / crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
e. Master Henry Moore see private criminal complaint filed against Master henry Moore / intimidating the wife and threatening her to move from her home before her discovery was done on May 5, 2015
f. Attorney Linda Whalen/ husbands attorney / crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
g. Attorney Heidi De Bernardo- Norton/ wife’s attorney crimes listed separately
h. Attorney Travis Dunn / wife’s attorney / crimes listed Separately
I. Attorney Terrance O Halloran, Director of Domestic relations refused wife an increase in APL to have her on a par with the husband for a fair divorce. He too ignored the husbands spousal support fraud and refused to collect the $300,000.00 owed to t he wife in back support.
I Mr. Laurence Bujdos crimes listed separately in private criminal complaints
j. husbands financial advisor Scott Shoup breach of fiduciary Duty and assisting with hiding assets.
k. husbands CPA Mr. Roy Reick Perjury and assisting in hiding assets
The Plaintiff is a public corruption victim and is suing THE Corrupt Defendants . in their private individual capacity and official capacities .
The Defendants criminal and unlawful acts are on record and were outside any immunity and official capacity.
CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT THE LAW AND FIX CASES FOR BRIBES
4. Defendant Judge Smail made a mockery of the proceedings by, e.g., illegally“punishing” the Plaintiff , a corruption victim
and fraudulently pretending he had authority under Federal .R.Civ.P.11 TO HEAR pleadings, which the defendant had FALSELY FILED WITH FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT, EX PARTE IN A STATE COURT.
Judge Smail and Judge Scherer both allowed Defendant Attorney Whalen to present false ex parte pleadings to the court and falsely swearing and signing that the pleadings
(1) were not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause
unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) falsely states the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions in the pleadings are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law.
(3) Attorney Whalen falsely states her factual contentions in the pleadings have evidentiary support when they did not and was proven in wife’ s counter claims.
(4) Any denials of factual contentions are not warranted due to the lack of suffcient evidence supporting Attorney Whalen’s claims, specifically so identified, by wife that prove Attorney Whalen’s claims are false and based on false information.
(c) WIFE’S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, FOR OBSTRUCTING DISCOVERY AGAINST ATTORNEY WHALEN WENT UNHEARD FOR 5YEARS .
(1) Both Judges failed to consider : In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to
respond, if the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may, but did not impose any appropriate sanction on Attorney, Whalen or her law firm, and her client violated the rule or is responsible for the violation.
Both judges failed to consider Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee,
(2) On the Court’s Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or
party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated
(4) Nature of a Sanction. A sanction should have been imposed and under this rule it must be
limited to what suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others
The sanction should have included, an order to pay a penalty into court; or,
if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order
directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and
other expenses directly resulting from the violation and against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2
(6) Requirements for an Order. An order imposing a sanction must describe the
sanctioned conduct and explain the basis for the sanction.
Rule 11 has been amended consistent with the 2007 stylistic changes to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Two provisions that are unique to the Superior Court rule
are retained, including language related to the court’s eFiling program and a provision
explicitly prohibiting use of a rubber stamp.
This rule is identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. This Rule also makes
clear that a signature affixed by a rubber stamp is not sufficient. As seen on many orders in this case.
Notice pleading, by contrast, simply requires a “short and plain statement” showing only that the pleader is entitled to relief. (FRCP 8(a)(2)).
One important exception to this rule is that, when a party alleges fraud, it must plead COMMENT 🙁 THE JUDGES IGNORED WIFES ALEGATIONS OF FRAUD, DENYING HER THE RIGHT TO PRESENT ) the facts of the alleged fraud with particularity. (FRCP 9(b) relates to Negligent Misrepresentation as a Deprivation of Plaintiffs’ Procedural Due Process Rights
Just like a bungling Government Whore, Defendant Judge Smail AND Judge Scherer perverted the law and rules and recklessly to assist Attorney Whalen and her clients scheme to defraud the wife of 25 million in marital assets.
Misapplied and Misused the powers of contempt against the wife for unlawful purposes of, e.g.,
Coercing the Plaintiffs to relinquish her rights to her marital property and force wife to be homeless with the threat of police escorting her out., by using the incorrect caselaw to evict her and made false disparaging comments against the wife to evict her from the home as another tool to assist the husbands attorney to force wife to settle for a lesser amount in the distribution than she is entitled to. Both Judges, the 2 masters and attorneys have committed Governmental crimes and extorted Plaintiffs’ property , before hearing her motions to vacate the final order due to procuring it with fraud and under color of a non-existent “regulation”, that was used to defraud the wife of $2.5 million.
Defendants deliberately deprived the Plaintiff , a victim of their corruption of her express fundamental rights under the Pennsylvania and Federal Constitutions.
All Defendant’s perverted, conspired and colluded with opposing counsel , her client and other Officials to pervert the Plaiintiffs express fundamental rights to be free of Government corruption, oppression, fraudulent seizure of property, to own property, and her deny her rights to exclude Government, redress Government grievances, and prevented her from defending against public corruption and proven Government crimes committed in this case.
All named defendants are involved in< CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL AND COVER UP AFOREMENTIONED CRIMES listed among the private criminal complaints filed against the defendants.
ALL defendants knew of the favors provided to Laurence Bujdos in a 5 million dollar divorce In exchange for bribes , and delaying this case for 5 years to allow the attorneys to churn $200,000.00 in fees and the court to take $200,000.00 from wifes share of the inequitable Distribution.
ALL WERE AWARE OF THE bribe that was paid to Master Eric Bononi for 10,000.00 by the husbands attorney.
They were aware that she paid him with a check that was from the parties retirement income she was illegally holding, as a part of her strategy to win the case by financially
Suppressing the wife, by taking her $3,750.00 a month income since Jan 2013.
The judge was aware the master waived a pretrial statement, refused to allow all wife’s to enter all her evidence on May 9, 2016
Allowed 2.5 million in marital assets to be hidden and
The master and the court Did not require full disclosure by the husband before procuring the unconscionable order on 7-18-17 .
Both judges allowed attorney Linda Whalen to present repeated meritless, vexatious false motions and also done ex parte.
Allowed Attorney Whalen to obstruct discovery when she refused o produce financial documents for discovery for 5 years.
Both Refused to provide wife with the correct Alimony Pendente Lite to have a fair divorce.
Refused to hear motions wife entered to prevent dissipation of $500,000.00 from an IRA.
Refused to dismiss an exclusive possession of the home hearing, that delayed the case 2 more years, with no laws to support the action that left the wife, a domestic violence victim homeless and awarding home to the abuser.
The court issued un explainable grossly inflated fees and fines charged to the wife / Deborah Bujdos for a unfounded contempt matter, in a deliberately delayed 5 year long divorce. Judge Smail witnessed suborning perjury on July 11, 2016 in the contempt matter and refused to allow the wife’s witnesses to the perjury to testify. He quashed the wife’s subpoena she served on the deputy who actually approached the husband on July 11, 2016 while he was coaching a witness under cross and told him to stop.
All participants are aware Deborah Bujdos was defrauded 2.5 million in Judge Smails 7-17-17 unconscionable fraudulent Equitable Distribution order that was missing 2.5 M owed to the wife and awarded the husband 5 M.
All were aware of the husband committing spousal support fraud and refused to enforce the payment of $300,000.00 owed to Deborah Bujdos/ wife for back support.
After the case was closed in December 2017 Judge Smail was removed from Family court after the wife
had made voluminous complaints since 9-9-15 to the president judge, the JCB and the court administrator and county commissioners with no response.
The records show a ll defendants conspired with other Government and judicial Officials and Defendants to conceal that Laurence Bujdos /Husband was hiding over 2.5 million in assets from Deborah Bujdos the wife,
also to conceal this Court lost subject matter jurisdiction when the second judge, Harry Smail accepted appointed by the recused judge Christian Scherer, who personally chose his replacement , Judge Scherer deliberately delayed the case for 3 years by denying the wife the correct Alimony Pendente lite and her own retirement annuity funds to be able to afford proper legal representation .
Judge Christian Scherer also unlawfully granted 2 ex parte damaging false motions, filed by husbands attorney in June 2015 .
This court was informed by the wife that they had lost Subject matter jurisdiction over all Laurence Bujdos’s claims for relief in the ill gotten proceedings , which were requested by the husband and his counsel. THIS COURT IGNORED THE LOSS OF JURIDICTION AND DELAYED THE CASE FOR 2 MORE YEARS, COSTING THE WIFE OVER $200,000.00 . The wife asked Judge Harry Smail to recuse 4 times and refused each time , from 9-9-15 – 2017 DUE TO EXTREME BLATANT BIAS AGAINST THE WIFE, THE WIFE PRESENTED NOTORIZED WITNESS STATEMENTS CONFIRMING HIS BIAS.
He remained on the case until he denied wife her 2.5 million she is entitled to and prevented her from appealing it by refusing to release funds for her to hire an appellate attorney to appeal his unconscionable, fraudulent order date 7-18-17 that was procured with extrinsic fraud. He ignored the wife’s 4 motions she timely filed to vacate the order due to fraud.
There were many crimes committed by the defendants and the wife filed private criminal complaints with the local DA who said they could not handle the crimes because they were federal.
The wife also sent information regarding this to the Attorney General, and the US Attorney and had no response to date.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.