Activity

NOTE: Kindly acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g., click “Reply All” and “Send”.

Fabricated indictments
based on false and insufficient evidence
presented to grand juries by
prosecutors, police officers, and judges
who abuse the jurors’ ignorance of the law and
untrained and uncritical judgment,
and reciprocally cover up their
dereliction of honest services and due process duties.
The proposal to expose the abusers through
unprecedented citizens hearings
and stories that can win investigative journalists and media outlets Pulitzer Prizes
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/IAB/DrRCordero_fabricated_indictments-public_officers.pdf

By

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School

D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris

Judicial-Discipline-Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

NOTES: To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to the website of Judicial Discipline Reform <left panel ↓Register; or + New or Users Add New; or fill out the New User form at https://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php. Those articles have attracted so many webvisitors and impressed them so positively that the number of visitors that they had motivated as of 25 March 2024, to become subscribers was 49,851.

The text below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows irregularities when received, such as:

a. joinedwords;

b. fonts of different sizes and faces;

c. varying interlinear spacing, so, watch for wide gaps between text;

d. headings and paragraphs with indents not corresponding to the letter or number identifying their hierarchical level, or

e. sentences with words [missing] that appear at the end of the paragraph missing,

they crept in during transit through the Internet and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of the text hereunder -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is downloadable here and through the link below.‡

A. Jointly exposing those who have fabricated indictments or covered them up, and their dynamics

1. This is a call by a grand juror lawyer to abusees, class action lawyers, investigative journalists, professors, and students to join forces to expose those public officers who have participated in the fabrication of indictments based on false and insufficient evidence and/or its cover-up, including:

a. current NY State Chief Judge Rowan Wilson, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore; former acting Chief Judge Anthony Cannataro; each of the other Court of Appeal Associate Judges;

b. Bronx Administrative Justice Alvin Yearwood; Grand Jury Justice Laurence Busching;

c. current Chief Administrative Judge Joseph Zayas; former Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks; Principal Administrative Secretary Tonya Speckhardt, et al.;

d. NY Police Department (NYPD) Internal Affairs Bureau (IAB) current Chief Miguel Iglesias and former Chief David Barrere; current Commissioner Edward Caban and former Commissioner Keechant Sewell, et al.;

e. former NYPD captain and current NY City Mayor Eric Adams;

f. Inspector General Sherrill Spatz, Esq., and Deputy Inspector General Carol Hamm, Esq., at the Office of Court Administration; and

g. NY City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and his county counterparts; et al.

2. Since 28 May 2022, some thirty public officers, including entities, have been informed by letter , email, and telephone of the fabricated indictments. A sample of email headers and text is collected in a pdf file; the addressees' email addresses are in the bloc of addresses below. Nevertheless, the officers have failed to even reply to them, yet the facts are both compelling and outrageous:

a. I am a lawyer and hold a Ph.D. in law. I was a member of a grand jury in Bronx, NY City. I had the knowledge and was in a position to realize that the prosecutors and police officers had charged people with murder despite the absence of any evidence thereof: No footage of the crime or photos of the victim or the street crime scene, or incident or autopsy report. The footage of the restaurants flanking the street did not show a crowd of onlookers or vehicles of the police, the medical examiner, or crime scene investigators.

b. The indictment was sought in reliance on grand jurors’ indifference and uncritical judgment. When I asked critical questions, the presenting and the supervising prosecutors referred me to the grand jury judge, who discharged me on the spot even though neither those prosecutors nor anybody else showed up to make any allegations against me.

c. I described these events in a 4,743-word, 8-page sworn statement and submitted it to the administrative judge. Late enough, he sent it to the grand jury judge, who with no discussion dismissed it on the trivial fact that the grand jury term had expired.

d. I filed a complaint with three chief judges; the NYS and NYC administrative judges; two NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau chiefs and two Commissioners; Bronx council members; public advocates and defenders; et al., who have not replied. They are part of the defendant class as accessories who fail to investigate judges to avoid their retaliation.

e. The fabricated indictments are used in plea bargain to support baseless charges that can extort the defendants’ agreement to the prosecutors’ sought plea.

3. Their failure reveals that they have engaged in coordination consisting in harmonious conduct in furtherance of common interests. Circumstantial evidence is as sufficient to establish such coordination as it is in a criminal case where it provides the predicate for the jury to find the defendant guilty and punishable by death.

a. A key interest is to avoid retaliation from judges, who would close ranks to protect any fellow judge implicated in admitting into evidence or covering up fabricated indictments; and strike back at the implicators. Such implication may derive from the judges' possessing actual knowledge of the fabrication or committing willful ignorance or blindness.

b. Prosecutors and police officers are interested in maximizing the number of plea bargains favorable to them by using fabricated indictments to coerce suspects into entering them: The more cases they win, the better their chances of being reelected or promoted.

4. In purpose and effect, whether implicitly or explicitly, for their gain and convenience, the coordinated public officers run a corrupt and racketeering enterprise. By so doing, they violate the Enterprise Corruption Law, NY Consolidated Laws, Penal Law-PEN §460; and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§1961 to 1968. They have committed:

a. abuse of the public power entrusted to them for the benefit of the sovereign source and destination of all public power in a democracy: We the People;

b. dereliction of duty to investigate allegations of wrongdoing and enforce the law, resulting in denial of equal protection under law;

c. obstruction of the administration of justice;

d. denial of honest services to be rendered through due diligence;

e. deprivation of liberty and property of those falsely accused of committing a crime, who incur expense to make bail, lose their jobs, and suffer reputational impairment by having a criminal record;

f. a cover-up to ensure reciprocal complicit protection: 'I don't investigate you and you don't investigate me'; and

g. deprivation of the right to be a member of a grand jury, confront accusers, present evidence, etc.

5. The exposure of coordinated abuse of power, public unaccountability, and need for justice system reform can turn those issues into decisive ones of the presidential debates, the primaries, and the general election campaign.

6. An informed and outraged public can incentivize the holding of the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings.

a. The citizens hearings are to be held by journalists, media outlets, Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts, and journalism, law, and IT students and professors.

b. Their venue will be media stations and school auditoriums.

c. They will be transmitted via the Internet so that wherever abusees and the audience are, they can tell and listen to the stories of the abuse that they have suffered or witnessed by those who have fabricated indictments or covered them up. See the two-phase method for writing your story in up to 500 words and in a way so that it is accurate, significant, and verifiable.

d. At the hearings, the abusees will shout self-assertively the rallying cry:

Enough is enough!
We won't take any abuse by anybody anymore.

e. Thus informing and outraging state and national audiences, the hearings will encourage ever more people to tell their story. A self-reinforcing process will snowball.

7. The citizens hearings can give rise to both a multidisciplinary academic and business investigation; and the development of a national, civic, Me Too!-like movement. Both will contribute to implementing a plan of action.

a. The hearings and the plan are aimed to spark the formation of a powerhouse centered on the media and academe that compels politicians, lest they be voted out of, or not into, office, to join the exposure of those who fabricate indictments; the collective demand for compensation for the abusees; and the pursuit of judicial reform.

b. That powerhouse can grow so strong as to bring about transformative change in American society and government to carry out the will of the People.

8. This is the most propitious time to respond to the call to join forces because the national public is receptive to it and resentful of public abuse of power and unaccountability:

a. Supreme Court justices have been exposed for engaging in unethical and illegal conduct; and failing to 'disqualify themselves in proceedings where their impartiality might reasonably be questioned'(28 U.S.C. §445), e.g., due to conflict of interests arising from their decades-long beneficial personal relationship with 'Friends of the Justices', such as billionaire Harlan Crow, as revealed by ProPublica. Consequently, public trust in the justices has plummeted;

b. the judicial treatment of President Biden's son and former President Trump has sparked allegations of double judicial standards and the politization of the Department of Justice; and

c. the current electoral season will allow politicians, whether principled or opportunistic, to turn judicial abuse, unaccountability, and reform into the distinguishing issues of their platform in an effort to earn public recognition as the People's Champions of Justice.

B. Hundreds of emails have been, and continue to be, sent to
officers and entities duty-bound to safeguard the integrity of the justice system, who do not reply

9. A representative sample of the headings and text of the hundreds of emails sent since 7 June 2022 to the following officers and entities is contained in a downloadable file‡:

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

10. I respectfully offer you and your colleagues and guests to make via video conference or, if in New York City, in person, a presentation on how to join forces to achieve the above-stated exposure, compensation, and reform; followed by a Questions & Answers session.

11. The presentation is supported by my professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. They are the skills that undergird my three-volume study*†♣ of judges and their judiciaries:

Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and

Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:

Pioneering the news and publishing field of

judicial unaccountability reporting*†♣

12. The study discusses evidence supporting the axiom 'Unaccountability breeds abuse'. Its corollary is 'What judges allow themselves to do -exposed by The Wall Street Journal and Thomson Reuters-, others copy and exceed'.

a. Former President Trump was found by NY State Judge Arthur Engoron to have committed business fraud, as stated in his decision of 26 September 2023. How much encouragement did he receive to defraud from his sister, former 3rd Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who was going to be investigated for inheritance tax fraud before she simply resigned with impunity and on a full pension(¶16c)?

b. Judges show in their conduct contemptuous disregard with impunity for the requirement in Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges -and their equivalent Code for state judges, e.g., 22 NYCRR Part 100- that they "avoid even the appearance of impropriety".

13. Some of my articles on unaccountability and abuse of power are posted to my website Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many webvisitors and impressed them so positively that as of 25 March 2024, the number of visitors that had become subscribers was 49,851.

C. A similar case of coordinated abuse of power and cover-up
involves Medicare and related entities

14. Similar emails have been sent since 4 October 2022 to the top officers of Medicare and related entities named infra, who have not replied or produced discovery, disclosure, or the overdue decision of the Medicare Appeals Council. Such failure to reply, produce, or decide results from, or works in effect, a coordinated cover-up to obstruct justice. Those officers have abused their power. Hence the need to expose them through the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings(¶6↑) on:

A call
to Medicare Appeals Council
to decide appeal M-23-386, filed on 28 October 2022 and still pending;

and

a call
to people who have been denied their rights by Medicare and related entities,
to class action law firms, and to investigative journalists,
to join forces to expose the abuse of power and cover-up
affecting so many people who assert their rights
as single party to their stand-alone case and
even do so without a lawyer (pro se), and
as a result, have barely any chance against coordinated
hospitals, medical practitioners,
equipment and laboratory services providers,
health insurance companies and health management organizations (HMOs)
and their networks of services and equipment providers,
medical decisions reviewers, administrative law judges,
Medicare, Medicaid, and the Medicare Appeals Council,
all with their lawyers and working together to further their common interest in
enlarging their networks of services and equipment providers;
denying claims of people to save money; and/or
billing them for the balance of bills in excess of
what the tables of medical costs allow by law and contract, which
constitutes balance billing and has been illegal since 1997♦(OL3:1611§A)
because it defeats the purpose of medical costs limited by health insurance,
thus prompting the recent adoption by Congress of the No Surprise Bill Act,

which so many entities with Medicare’s condonation blatantly disregard‡ in their interest and
to the detriment of their patients and their insureds
‡ http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/ALJ/23-8-28DrRCordero_class_action_v_Medicare.pdf

1. emails sent To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare shout "I accuse!"…You may trigger history and enter it.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, New York City, USA 10472-6506
Judicial Discipline Reform
tel. 1(718)827-9521

[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]

https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b

E. Emails on Fabricated indictments

exchanged between 7 June 2022 and 30 September 2023,

excerpted from the file containing hundreds of them

….

******

Att.: Ms. Cindy
Office of Court Administration
New York State Unified Court System
New York City, NY
tel. (212)428-2100
[email protected];

Tonya Speckhardt

Principal Administrative Secretary
New York State Unified Court System
Office of Court Administration (OCA)

4 ESP, Suite 2001

Albany, NY 12223

[email protected]
tel. (518) 453-8680

Dear Ms. Speckhardt,