Category: Basic Pages
Notifications

NOTIFICATIONS FOR MOBILE DEVICES AND COMPUTERS BROWSER SET UP Turn ON Notifications to alert you of activity FIREFOX Top right, Click on (3 dashes) Scroll down in the dropdown, Click on (Settings) Left side of screen, select (Privacy & Security) Scroll down to “Permissions” look for “Notifications” Click on “Settings” to ensure “chat.courtvictim.com” is set to “Allowed” Click on “Save Changes” ANDROID & PC VIDEO CHROME Top right, Click on (3 dashes) Scroll down in the dropdown, Click on (Settings) Left side of screen, select (Privacy & Security) Scroll down to “Site Security” Look for “Notifications” ensure “Allowed websites has option” Under Customized Behaviors, select “ADD” and enter the domain like below Allowed to send notifications for www.chat.courtvictim.com ANDROID & PC VIDEO IOS (Apple) ENSURE NOTIFICATIONS SETTINGS ARE SET CORRECTLY Go to your messages via your profile, click on Messages 1. Click on the gear icon top right of your Messages Ensure the settings are “ON” Notifications Check to Enable notifications via email (A) Make sure Browser push notifications is Enable, NOT Disable (B) Your screen should look similar to the above if set correctly Read More
COURT VICTIM SOLUTION

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More
Locking Folks Up Without Due Process? California Sure Does

Can you imagine you wake up one day and everything you own, worked for and possess is now owned by the state and can be sold off to pay lawyers, bribed judges and dishonest parties like your own family by ONE DOCTOR? By Janet Phelan It’s official. The right to due process is now superseded by a form That’s right. California can strip you of your right to free movement, your right of association and most of your freedoms should a doctor see fit to check number 14 k on this form. No more messy 5150 holds, no more civil commitments or court oversight. No unpleasant guardianship proceedings with even more unpleasant family members. Just some doc in an office wielding a pen. Seriously. The form is LIC 602 A and is reproduced here https://www.cdss.ca.gov/cdssweb/entres/forms/english/lic602a.pdf California has made some efforts to provide legal proceedings and protections for those whose competency is questioned. There are 72-hour holds, which can be extended through legal means. There are conservatorships, which have received some media scrutiny of late and may be rife with further abuses, including documented concerns that probate court judges are violating… Read More
WHAT IS COMMUNITY by COURTVICTIM.COM

Welcome to the Court Victim COMMUNITY Security and Censorship free Offshore hosted (protected from being taken down or affected by legal actions from the US or other countries) NO FACEBOOK Censorship, no jail no being shadow-banned. However, we do NOT tolerate hate speech, dis-respect or violence. Who we are? We are all victims volunteering our time, efforts and funds to create a safe place to network, share and support one another. We are NOT providing legal advice, we can share our experiences with the legal system and what we did. Not only that, but we can help you find other victims in your area, state or county. To prove a pattern of abuse, to help discover what works and what does not. Who are work with: Sherry Lund Dr. Richard I. Fine What we offer Note the site is divided into two specific sections for different reasons and purpose. Do you want the world to find out what has been done to you and find others? Do you want to only share with other victims you know? That is where Public and Private areas differ. PUBLIC AREA Which means just… Read More
5/12/2023 US Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing filed Petition not Opposed Supreme Court Conference Set For June 8, 2023

The petition for rehearing is one of the most important cases before the Supreme Court. It will require the state government executive branch, legislative branch and judicial branch to uphold their oath of office to obey the U.S. Constitution and not “war against the Constitution”. It requires the U.S. Supreme Court to follow its precedents of Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. School Board and Cooper v. Aaron requiring the Supreme Court sets the law, due process must be followed and violating the oath of office is “war against the Constitution”, respectively. To deny the Petition for Rehearing, will be to overturn these cases interpreting the Constitution from its outset. May 12 US Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing filed READ THE PETITION HERE Actual Supreme Court Document location MORE ON DR. RICHARD I. FINE AND AMEND SBX 2 11 What is Wrong with the County Payments to Judges? TODAY OUR CHOICE IS: (1) VOTE “NO”; or (2) CONTINUE TO LIVE UNDER A CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM! The Dirty Truth Behind California’s $400 Million of “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” The Campaign for Judicial Integrity Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs…. Read More