Category: United States

No comments

What are they teaching lawyers and judges regarding guardianship?

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

From: National Guardianship Association <info@guardianship.org> Date: Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 2:48 PM Subject: Presenting the complete details for NGA’s 2024 conference! We are thrilled to present the agenda for NGA’s 2024 National Conference on Guardianship, being held October 19 – 22 in Long Beach, California! Complete details are available in the conference brochure. As you’ve come to expect from NGA, this year’s program features outstanding presentations that will appeal to professional and family guardians, public and private guardians, and participants at every level of experience. Online registration will open next week, and we will send an announcement when it opens. In the meantime, review the educational sessions, reserve your hotel room, and mark your calendar to join us in Long Beach! Quick Links Download Conference Brochure Sponsor and Exhibitor Info Scholarships (Application deadline is Friday) Auction Info and Donation Form Hotel Website Hotel Reservations Conference Website (coming soon) Online Registration (coming soon) View the Brochure Copyright © 2024 National Guardianship Association, All rights reserved. You have been included in this message because of your interest in the National Guardianship Association. Our mailing address is: National Guardianship Association 174 Crestview Drive Bellefonte, PA… Read More

No comments

Who is Wayne County Elder Abuser Federal Judge George Caram Steeh?

  By , , ,
Wayne County Michigan Federal Judge George Caram Steeh

Federal Judge George Caram Steeh This Judge Enables Elder Abuse, ADA Violations Judge George Caram Steeh, III is an Article III federal judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 1998 nominated by President Bill Clinton and took on status January 2013. From Ann Arbor, Michigan, Judge George Steeh graduated from University of Michigan-Ann Arbor obtained both a bachelor’s and J.D. degrees in 1969 and 1973. Career After Law School, Judge George Steeh became part of the Genesee County Prosecutor’s Office from 1973 to 1980 as an Assistant prosecuting attorney 1973-1978, then promoted to First assistant prosecuting attorney 1978-1980. From 1980-1988, Judge George Steeh was a private practice attorney in Michigan before he was elected to the Macomb County Board of Commissioners 1986 until 1989, after which Judge George Steeh started his career as a Michigan District 41-B Court Judge 1989-1990 then elected judge for the 16th District Circuit Court from 1990-1998. Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, 1789-present The directory includes the biographies of judges presidentially appointed to serve during good behavior since 1789 on the U.S. district courts, U.S. courts of appeals,… Read More

No comments

September 6 2023 A Day of Infamy for Justice in America

  By , , , , , , ,

A bold headline! What does it mean? September 6, 2023, is the last day that the California Legislature can amend pending California Assembly Judicial Committee Bill AB 1756, “Omnibus Judicial Legislation” to end thirty-seven (37) years of judicial corruption depriving California citizens and residents due process and an honest judicial system. The judiciary illegally accepted approximately $1-1.1 billion from California counties and courts, in violation of the California Penal Code’s “bribe” and related sections, and the federal criminal law 18 U.S.C. Section 1346 – “The Intangible Right to Honest Services” under which “Bribery” is an element to prove. The California Legislature has refused to stop the corruption for thirty-seven (37) years: (1) since 1985 when the “illegal payments” began; (2) 2000 when Richard I. Fine “discovered” the hidden illegal payments and exposed them in court documents; (3) 2008 when the California Court of Appeal held the payments violated the California Constitution; (4) immediately followed by 2009 when the California Judicial Council, the courts and the judges prevailed upon Darryl Steinberg, President pro Tempore of the California State Senate to falsely claim an Emergency Session of the State Legislature and pass… Read More

No comments

PODCAST RICHARD FINE Judicial Reform August 27, 2023

  By , , , , , , , , , , ,

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state, after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More

Judge David P. Yaffe — Perched on a Throne in ‘Wonderland’

  By , , , , , , ,

Judge David P. Yaffe — Perched on a Throne in ‘Wonderland’ By ROGER M. GRACE I’m not exactly objective when it comes to Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe. I can’t stand him. I’ve appeared before him in three cases. (The Daily Journal Corporation sought to wrest a City of Los Angeles contract from the Metropolitan News Company, and lost; MNC pushed for rescission of two County of Los Angeles contracts awarded to DJC, and lost.) Too, I’ve viewed Yaffe’s handling of numerous other cases with which I’ve been unconnected. I commented in a column on Sept. 15 on one proceeding I viewed while waiting for a matter to be called; Yaffe imposed a $200 sanction on a plaintiff’s lawyer for not giving notice of a status conference to lawyers for the other parties. The problem was that there were no other attorneys of record in the case. And Yaffe imposed that sanction on Aug. 24 notwithstanding that one day after he issued an OSC re sanction on July 26, the Court of Appeal, in a published opinion, invalidated a sanction meted out under identical circumstances. From what… Read More