[Julian]

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial-Discipline-Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, Corderoric@yahoo.com

Fabricated indictments
based on false and insufficient evidence
presented to grand juries by
prosecutors, police officers, and judges
who abuse the jurors’ ignorance of the law and
untrained and uncritical judgment,
and reciprocally cover up their
dereliction of honest services and due process duties.
The proposal to expose the abusers through
unprecedented citizens hearings
and stories that can win investigative journalists and media outlets Pulitzer Prizeshttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/IAB/DrRCordero_fabricated_indictments-public_officers.pdf
A. Jointly exposing those who have fabricated indictments or covered them up, and their dynamics
1. This is a call by a grand juror lawyer to abusees, class action lawyers, investigative journalists, professors, and students to join forces to expose those public officers who have participated in the fabrication of indictments based on false and insufficient evidence and/or its cover-up, including:

a. current NY State Chief Judge Rowan Wilson, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore; former acting Chief Judge Anthony Cannataro; each of the other Court of Appeal Associate Judges;

b. Bronx Administrative Justice Alvin Yearwood; Grand Jury Justice Laurence Busching;

c. current Chief Administrative Judge Joseph Zayas; former Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks; Principal Administrative Secretary Tonya Speckhardt, et al.;
d. NY Police Department (NYPD) Internal Affairs Bureau (IAB) current Chief Miguel Iglesias and former Chief David Barrere; current Commissioner Edward Caban and former Commissioner Keechant Sewell, et al.;
e. former NYPD captain and current NY City Mayor Eric Adams;

f. Inspector General Sherrill Spatz, Esq., and Deputy Inspector General Carol Hamm, Esq., at the Office of Court Administration; and
g. NY City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and his county counterparts; et al.

2. Since 28 May 2022, some thirty public officers, including entities, have been informed by letter , email, and telephone of the fabricated indictments. A sample of email headers and text is collected in a pdf file; the addressees’ email addresses are in the bloc of addresses below. Nevertheless, the officers have failed to even reply to them, yet the facts are both compelling and outrageous:
a. I am a lawyer and hold a Ph.D. in law. I was a member of a grand jury in Bronx, NY City. I had the knowledge and was in a position to realize that the prosecutors and police officers had charged people with murder despite the absence of any evidence thereof: No footage of the crime or photos of the victim or the street crime scene, or incident or autopsy report. The footage of the restaurants flanking the street did not show a crowd of onlookers or vehicles of the police, the medical examiner, or crime scene investigators.

b. The indictment was sought in reliance on grand jurors’ indifference and uncritical judgment. When I asked critical questions, the presenting and the supervising prosecutors referred me to the grand jury judge, who discharged me on the spot even though neither those prosecutors nor anybody else showed up to make any allegations against me.

c. I described these events in a 4,743-word, 8-page sworn statement and submitted it to the administrative judge. Late enough, he sent it to the grand jury judge, who with no discussion dismissed it on the trivial fact that the grand jury term had expired.

d. I filed a complaint with three chief judges; the NYS and NYC administrative judges; two NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau chiefs and two Commissioners; Bronx council members; public advocates and defenders; et al., who have not replied. They are part of the defendant class as accessories who fail to investigate judges to avoid their retaliation.

e. The fabricated indictments are used in plea bargain to support baseless charges that can extort the defendants’ agreement to the prosecutors’ sought plea.
3.
4.
5.

6. An informed and outraged public can incentivize the holding of the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings.

a. The citizens hearings are to be held by journalists, media outlets, Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts, and journalism, law, and IT students and professors.

b. Their venue will be media stations and school auditoriums.

c. They will be transmitted via the Internet so that wherever abusees and the audience are, they can tell and listen to the stories of the abuse that they have suffered or witnessed by those who have fabricated indictments or covered them up. See the two-phase method for writing your story in up to 500 words and in a way so that it is accurate, significant, and verifiable.

d. At the hearings, the abusees will shout self-assertively the rallying cry:

Enough is enough!
We won’t take any abuse by anybody anymore.

e. Thus informing and outraging state and national audiences, the hearings will encourage ever more people to tell their story. A self-reinforcing process will snowball.

7. The citizens hearings can give rise to both a multidisciplinary academic and business investigation; and the development of a national, civic, Me Too!-like movement. Both will contribute to implementing a plan of action.

a. The hearings and the plan are aimed to spark the formation of a powerhouse centered on the media and academe that compels politicians, lest they be voted out of, or not into, office, to join the exposure of those who fabricate indictments; the collective demand for compensation for the abusees; and the pursuit of judicial reform.

b. That powerhouse can grow so strong as to bring about transformative change in American society and government to carry out the will of the People.
8.

B. Hundreds of emails have been, and continue to be, sent to
officers and entities duty-bound to safeguard the integrity of the justice system, who do not reply
9.

10. I respectfully offer you and your colleagues and guests to make via video conference or, if in New York City, in person, a presentation on how to join forces to achieve the above-stated exposure, compensation, and reform; followed by a Questions & Answers session.

11. The presentation is supported by my professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. They are the skills that undergird my three-volume study*†♣ of judges and their judiciaries:

Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and

Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:

Pioneering the news and publishing field of

judicial unaccountability reporting*†♣

12. The study discusses evidence supporting the axiom ‘Unaccountability breeds abuse’. Its corollary is ‘What judges allow themselves to do -exposed by The Wall Street Journal and Thomson Reuters-, others copy and exceed’.

13. Some of my articles on unaccountability and abuse of power are posted to my website Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many web visitors and impressed them so positively that as of 18 February 2024, the number of visitors that had become subscribers was 49,680.

C. A similar case of coordinated abuse of power and cover-up
involves Medicare and related entities

14. Similar emails have been sent since 4 October 2022 to the top officers of Medicare and related entities named infra, who have not replied or produced discovery, disclosure, or the overdue decision of the Medicare Appeals Council. Such failure to reply, produce, or decide results from, or works in effect, a coordinated cover-up to obstruct justice. Those officers have abused their power. Hence the need to expose them through the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings(¶6↑) on:

A call
to Medicare Appeals Council
to decide appeal M-23-386, filed on 28 October 2022 and still pending;

and a call to people who have been denied their rights by Medicare and related entities,
to class action law firms, and to investigative journalists,
to join forces to expose the abuse of power and cover-up
affecting so many people who assert their rights
as single party to their stand-alone case and
even do so without a lawyer (pro se), and
as a result, have barely any chance against coordinated
hospitals, medical practitioners,
equipment and laboratory services providers,
health insurance companies and health management organizations (HMOs)
and their networks of services and equipment providers,
medical decisions reviewers, administrative law judges,
Medicare, Medicaid, and the Medicare Appeals Council,
all with their lawyers and working together to further their common interest in
enlarging their networks of services and equipment providers;
denying claims of people to save money; and/or
billing them for the balance of bills in excess of
what the tables of medical costs allow by law and contract, which
constitutes balance billing and has been illegal since 1997♦(OL3:1611§A)
because it defeats the purpose of medical costs limited by health insurance,
thus prompting the recent adoption by Congress of the No Surprise Bill Act, which so many entities with Medicare’s condonation blatantly disregard‡ in their interest and

to the detriment of their patients and their insureds
‡ http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/ALJ/23-8-28DrRCordero_class_action_v_Medicare.pdf
I look forward to hearing from you.

Dare shout “I accuse!”…You may trigger history and enter it.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, New York City, USA 10472-6506
Judicial Discipline Reform
tel. 1(718)827-9521

[Author]

Posts