Tag: Los Angeles County

No comments

What are they teaching lawyers and judges regarding guardianship?

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

From: National Guardianship Association <info@guardianship.org> Date: Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 2:48 PM Subject: Presenting the complete details for NGA’s 2024 conference! We are thrilled to present the agenda for NGA’s 2024 National Conference on Guardianship, being held October 19 – 22 in Long Beach, California! Complete details are available in the conference brochure. As you’ve come to expect from NGA, this year’s program features outstanding presentations that will appeal to professional and family guardians, public and private guardians, and participants at every level of experience. Online registration will open next week, and we will send an announcement when it opens. In the meantime, review the educational sessions, reserve your hotel room, and mark your calendar to join us in Long Beach! Quick Links Download Conference Brochure Sponsor and Exhibitor Info Scholarships (Application deadline is Friday) Auction Info and Donation Form Hotel Website Hotel Reservations Conference Website (coming soon) Online Registration (coming soon) View the Brochure Copyright © 2024 National Guardianship Association, All rights reserved. You have been included in this message because of your interest in the National Guardianship Association. Our mailing address is: National Guardianship Association 174 Crestview Drive Bellefonte, PA… Read More

No comments

Freedom Enough 036 – Donald Charles Schwartz by Alexander Baker

  By
Freedom Enough 36 Donald Charles Schwartz White Collar Criminal If There Ever Was One

Freedom Enough 036 – Donald Charles Schwartz Today: – White Collar Criminal If There Ever Was One Date: Sunday, September 17, 2023 Time: 2 PM East / 11 AM Pacific Where: Speak Free Radio (audio, archives here) Where else: (video, archives here) Why: Because you want to escape the cage and live free from government.  Does a civil Justice System exist at all? Or, is the court system just a playground for white collar criminals? Who is this California attorney Donald Charles Schwartz? Now that he has been caught red-handed committing felony forgery of court documents, and conspiring with adverse counsel to frame his own client for perjury, so that the defendant in the lawsuit can avoid liability for RICO Racketeering and Fraud – Is the judge in the case just going to let Don Schwartz get away with this? [2] Hello world – I am… It’s September 17, 2023, today on Freedom Enough # 36 – Donald Charles Schwartz – White Collar Criminal if Ever There Was One. I have seen a lot of lawyers to a lot of crooked, underhanded, nefarious things to their own clients. But… Read More

No comments

September 6 2023 A Day of Infamy for Justice in America

  By , , , , , , ,

A bold headline! What does it mean? September 6, 2023, is the last day that the California Legislature can amend pending California Assembly Judicial Committee Bill AB 1756, “Omnibus Judicial Legislation” to end thirty-seven (37) years of judicial corruption depriving California citizens and residents due process and an honest judicial system. The judiciary illegally accepted approximately $1-1.1 billion from California counties and courts, in violation of the California Penal Code’s “bribe” and related sections, and the federal criminal law 18 U.S.C. Section 1346 – “The Intangible Right to Honest Services” under which “Bribery” is an element to prove. The California Legislature has refused to stop the corruption for thirty-seven (37) years: (1) since 1985 when the “illegal payments” began; (2) 2000 when Richard I. Fine “discovered” the hidden illegal payments and exposed them in court documents; (3) 2008 when the California Court of Appeal held the payments violated the California Constitution; (4) immediately followed by 2009 when the California Judicial Council, the courts and the judges prevailed upon Darryl Steinberg, President pro Tempore of the California State Senate to falsely claim an Emergency Session of the State Legislature and pass… Read More

No comments

PODCAST RICHARD FINE Judicial Reform August 27, 2023

  By , , , , , , , , , , ,

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state, after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More

COURT VICTIM SOLUTION

  By , , , , , , , , , ,
Help support Dr Richard I fines Amend SBX 2 11 to stop judicial corruption

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

  By , , , , , , , , ,
Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignore judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California… Read More