Category: Basic Pages

Notifications

  By
Court Victim Community how to activate notifications

NOTIFICATIONS FOR MOBILE DEVICES AND COMPUTERS BROWSER SET UP Turn ON Notifications to alert you of activity FIREFOX Top right, Click on (3 dashes) Scroll down in the dropdown, Click on (Settings) Left side of screen, select (Privacy & Security) Scroll down to “Permissions” look for “Notifications” Click on “Settings” to ensure “chat.courtvictim.com” is set to “Allowed” Click on “Save Changes” ANDROID & PC VIDEO CHROME Top right, Click on (3 dashes) Scroll down in the dropdown, Click on (Settings) Left side of screen, select (Privacy & Security) Scroll down to “Site Security” Look for “Notifications” ensure “Allowed websites has option” Under Customized Behaviors, select “ADD” and enter the domain like below Allowed to send notifications for www.chat.courtvictim.com ANDROID & PC VIDEO IOS (Apple) ENSURE NOTIFICATIONS SETTINGS ARE SET CORRECTLY Go to your messages via your profile, click on Messages 1. Click on the gear icon top right of your Messages Ensure the settings are “ON” Notifications Check to Enable notifications via email (A) Make sure Browser push notifications is Enable, NOT Disable (B) Your screen should look similar to the above if set correctly   Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

COURT VICTIM SOLUTION

  By , , , , , , , ,
Help support Dr Richard I fines Amend SBX 2 11 to stop judicial corruption

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

WHAT IS COMMUNITY by COURTVICTIM.COM

  By , , , ,

Welcome to the Court Victim COMMUNITY Security and Censorship free Offshore hosted (protected from being taken down or affected by legal actions from the US or other countries) NO FACEBOOK Censorship, no jail no being shadow-banned. However, we do NOT tolerate hate speech, dis-respect or violence. Who we are? We are all victims volunteering our time, efforts and funds to create a safe place to network, share and support one another. We are NOT providing legal advice, we can share our experiences with the legal system and what we did. Not only that, but we can help you find other victims in your area, state or county. To prove a pattern of abuse, to help discover what works and what does not. Who are work with: Sherry Lund Dr. Richard I. Fine What we offer Note the site is divided into two specific sections for different reasons and purpose. Do you want the world to find out what has been done to you and find others? Do you want to only share with other victims you know? That is where Public and Private areas differ. PUBLIC AREA Which means just… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

5/12/2023 US Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing filed Petition not Opposed Supreme Court Conference Set For June 8, 2023

  By , , , ,
Los Angeles California Supreme Court ignores judicial corruption victims ignoring Amend SBX 2 11

The petition for rehearing is one of the most important cases before the Supreme Court. It will require the state government executive branch, legislative branch and judicial branch to uphold their oath of office to obey the U.S. Constitution and not “war against the Constitution”. It requires the U.S. Supreme Court to follow its precedents of Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. School Board and Cooper v. Aaron requiring the Supreme Court sets the law, due process must be followed and violating the oath of office is “war against the Constitution”, respectively. To deny the Petition for Rehearing, will be to overturn these cases interpreting the Constitution from its outset. May 12 US Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing filed READ THE PETITION HERE Actual Supreme Court Document location MORE ON DR. RICHARD I. FINE AND AMEND SBX 2 11 What is Wrong with the County Payments to Judges? TODAY OUR CHOICE IS: (1) VOTE “NO”; or (2) CONTINUE TO LIVE UNDER A CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM! The Dirty Truth Behind California’s $400 Million of “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” The Campaign for Judicial Integrity Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs…. Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

4/14/2023 the US Supreme Court Conference Decides the Future US Judicial System by Deciding this Petition

  By , , , ,

April 14 is a day of monumental decision for the US Supreme Court: (1) do the justices uphold the 14th Amendment, Supreme Court precedents of over 200 years and the codes of conduct and penal codes by reversing the California Supreme Court and voiding all decisions by state judges and justices who accepted illegal payments from counties or trial courts when they were California State trial court judges; or (2) violate all of the above by denying the unopposed Petition. A denial will effectively destroy the integrity, functioning and respect for the U.S. Judicial System. READ THE PETITION HERE   MORE ON DR. RICHARD I. FINE AND AMEND SBX 2 11 What is Wrong with the County Payments to Judges? TODAY OUR CHOICE IS: (1) VOTE “NO”; or (2) CONTINUE TO LIVE UNDER A CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM! The Dirty Truth Behind California’s $400 Million of “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” The Campaign for Judicial Integrity Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE SBX 2 11 gave retroactive immunity from California criminal prosecution, civil liability and disciplinary action to… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE