Category: Chief Justice

SBX 211 Bill Sponsors

  By , ,

Senator Jeff Stone [R] Primary Sponsored Bills SD-028 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Joel Anderson [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-038 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Patricia Bates [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-036 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Tom Berryhill [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-008 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Jean Fuller [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-016 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Ted Gaines [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-001 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Robert Huff [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-029 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Mike Morrell [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-023 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Jim Nielsen [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-004 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Sharon Runner [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-021 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Senator Andy Vidak [R] Cosponsor Sponsored Bills SD-014 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Assemblymember Catharine Baker [R] Joint Sponsored Bills HD-016 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Assemblymember Brian Maienschein [D] Joint Sponsored Bills HD-076 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Assemblymember Chad Mayes [I] Joint Sponsored Bills HD-042 FollowTheMoney Ballotpedia VoteSmart Assemblymember Marc Steinorth [R] Read More

BILL NUMBER: SBX2 11 INTRODUCED

  By , ,

BILL NUMBER: SBX2 11 INTRODUCED BILL TEXT INTRODUCED BY Senator Stone (Coauthors: Senators Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Gaines, Huff, Morrell, Nielsen, Runner, and Vidak) (Co authors: Assembly Members Baker, Maienschein, Mayes, and Steinorth) JULY 16, 2015 An act to add Section 14670.08 to the Government Code, relating to developmental services. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST SB 11, as introduced, Stone. Developmental services: developmental center closures. Existing law vests in the State Department of Developmental Services jurisdiction over state hospitals referred to as developmental centers for the provision of residential care to individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to comply with procedural requirements when closing a developmental center, including submitting a detailed plan to the Legislature and holding at least one public hearing. Under existing law, the department allocates funds to private nonprofit entities known as regional centers, which are required to provide, or arrange for the provision of, services and supports for persons with developmental disabilities. This bill would require the Department of Finance, upon the closure of the Sonoma Developmental Center, Fairview Developmental Center, or the nonsecured portion of the Porterville Developmental Center, to deposit the net savings… Read More

COURT VICTIM SOLUTION

  By , , , , , , , , , ,
Help support Dr Richard I fines Amend SBX 2 11 to stop judicial corruption

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must… Read More

Probate Mafia How Judges Rob us of Justice, Rights and Money

  By , , , , , , , , , ,
Probate Mafia American Judges robing the public of rights law and justice

America is being robbed by judges who whore themselves out to anyone willing to pay VIOLATING LAW AND RIGHTS, IGNORING DUE PROCESS The scam is simple and has been going on for decades. Connected dirty lawyers make back room deals with corrupt judges (who are often law school friends or worked together for a law firm). What this begins is a totally illegal process that is hidden behind courtroom walls and sealed records. Made legal because it happened before a judge, who did not stop it or object. Perjury, fraud, embezzlement even over medicating with heavy duty psychotropic medications (which are known to cause death) are legally administered. Not only that, legal wills, power of attorney, trusts, (any legal document) are ignored or overturned by the judge. WHY? Because there’s zero accountability of prosecution, so as the saying goes “When the cat is away the mouse will play”. These crime scenes (courtrooms) are free to do as they wish and, certainly, they break all the rules. Should you question the court’s action, get involved at great legal expense to expose what’s going on or try and help the victim, you’ll… Read More

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

  By , , , , , , , , ,
Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignore judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California… Read More