Category: California

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

  By , , , , , , , , ,
Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignore judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California… Read More

Who Sold Out the People and Justice Corrupt Justice Ronald M. George

  By , ,
Los Angeles County Superior court judge California Chief Justice Corrupt Ronald M George

Corrupt Chief Justice Ronald Marc George What is totally disgusting about this man is how he hides the criminal he really is via the background of high-end legal law schools, awards and assignments, but the truth is, he created SBX 2 11 to help his fellow lawyers and judges to escape any accountability or prosecution for being part of the exposed bribery of over 90% of California Superior court judges. This is common for the most evil, dishonorable, criminal judges or lawyers to hide behind a false image of good or honesty. Would an honorable person create SBX 211? More about SBX 211 California Bar Attorney Profile Ronald Marc George #36837 License Status: Active Address: 1333 Jones St #706, San Francisco, CA 94109 Phone: 415-314-1896 License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions. Date License Status Discipline Administrative Action Present Active 1/3/2011 Active 6/7/1965 Admitted to the State Bar of California PONDERING WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION: THE COLLAPSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT IN CALIFORNIA By Peter J. Mancus Candidate for Member of the State Assembly; District 10 More on Peter J. Mancus… Read More

Dr. Richard I. Fine’s Personal Experience “Will the corruption finally end?”

  By , , ,

Will the Corruption Finally End? Involved Players in the silencing of Dr. Richard I. Fine, exposing the majority of California Superior Court Judges to accepting bribes. If this is what the top justice and Supreme court do when an ethical BAR member exposes bribery and corruption, it only confirms how corrupt the entire BAR and court system is No. 22-782 Title: Carol Pulliam, Petitioner v.  University of Southern California Docketed: February 17, 2023 Lower Ct: Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District Case Numbers: (B304749) Decision Date: August 23, 2022 Rehearing Denied: September 8, 2022 Discretionary Court Decision Date: November 16, 2022 TIMELINE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS OF PETITION TO SUPREME COURT Feb 14 2023 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2023) Mar 09 2023 Waiver of right of respondent University of Southern California to respond filed. Mar 22 2023 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023 Apr 17 2023 Petition DENIED May 12 2023 Petition for Rehearing filed May 23 2023 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023 How many Judges does it take to keep Judicial Corruption from being stopped? David P. Yafee, Los Angeles Superior Court… Read More

Jerry Cox Mariposa County California Corruption dishonorable judge land steal

  By ,
Mariposa County California Jerry Cox story Bison Creek Ranch Corruption

FULL JERRY COX MARIPOSA COUNTY CALIFORNIA CORRUPTION STORY Mariposa’s officials definitely owe Jerry Cox for deformation of character! They have been trying to frame Jerry for years, it’s obvious, even before the false rape accusation! For example: the silly small-town firewood bandit bull crap lol!? That was the obvious start to knowing they were after Jerry. Anyway, the fact of the matter is, what they did was NOT THE AMERICAN WAY! Are Silver & Wright trying to hurry and come up with a way to cover up that they excessively went after Jerry ONLY because they don’t like him? They can and will do this to someone next! The town will see in the end that Jerry fought for his rights, American rights, and the American dream! #america #undefeated #justice4jerry Duane EndresTHE JERRY COX STORY rneodtSops07i ulctc481u07am38m3r6na0l20i5lJuh4t9hu2y349lhfaa   Update: As of today, all the “rats have jumped ship” but, Our county lawyer in the bottom-right corner along with his “Policing for Profit” Silver & Wright lawyers on top! Here you see in the middle one of their “images used on their brochures” where they present & coach County Government officials on how… Read More

Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE

  By , ,
Richard I Fine Petition to the Supreme Court of California For A Writ Of Certiorari

“Richard I. Fine Presents the argument against paying County or Court Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments to Judges, to the US Supreme Court.” ========================================================================================= In The Supreme Court of the United States ——————————— ♦ ——————————— CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner, vs. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ——————————— ♦ ——————————— On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of California ——————————— ♦ ——————————— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ——————————— ♦ ——————————— RICHARD ISAAC FINE, ESQ. P.O. Box 789, 1187 Coast Village Rd., Ste. 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93102-0789 Telephone: (310) 622-6900 Email: richardfine@richardfinelaw.com Counsel for Petitioner Carol Pulliam ================================================================================================== COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Do state court trial judges, court of appeal justices and supreme court justices “war against the (United States) Constitution” by denying state litigants Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional due process when each and/or all these judicial officers did not disclose and recuse themselves as required by state law, state Code of Judicial Ethics and/or other state or federal requirements when he/she: (1) currently receives or in the past received payments from: (a) the county currently paying or paid the Respondent for Respondent’s services; and/or… Read More

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM HARMING CHILDREN, DENYING DUE PROCESS & VIOLATING OF CIVIL RIGHTS

  By ,
Expose Santa Barbara County California Judge Donna D Geck

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM DENYING DUE PROCESS Fit mother denied any contact for over 600 days with her 5-year-old twins, violating civil rights under the color of law, placing children with a Father with a prior murder conviction, 5 DUI arrests, history of domestic violence with 3 counts of battery charges. This is a Call to Action to remove Judge Donna D. Geck from the bench of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court, as she is harming children and denying due process. Judge Donna D. Geck is a Judicial Officer for the Anacapa Division, Santa Barbara, California, who has a plethora of complaints against her rulings in the cases she oversees: Civil, Criminal, Family Law, Juvenile, Probate, Appeals, and Small Claims. The 3-year-old twins (now 5) were placed in full custody of the father when the mother requested permission from the court to move with the children to the next county 30 miles away. Judge Geck did not grant the move away. Judge Geck had full knowledge of the father’s criminal history when she placed the children with the father full time. Judge Geck then denied an evidentiary… Read More