Jerry Cox Mariposa County California Corruption dishonorable judge land steal

Mariposa County California Jerry Cox story Bison Creek Ranch Corruption

FULL JERRY COX MARIPOSA COUNTY CALIFORNIA CORRUPTION STORY Mariposa’s officials definitely owe Jerry Cox for deformation of character! They have been trying to frame Jerry for years, it’s obvious, even before the false rape accusation! For example: the silly small-town firewood bandit bull crap lol!? That was the obvious start to knowing they were after Jerry. Anyway, the fact of the matter is, what they did was NOT THE AMERICAN WAY! Are Silver & Wright trying to hurry and come up with a way to cover up that they excessively went after Jerry ONLY because they don’t like him? They can and will do this to someone next! The town will see in the end that Jerry fought for his rights, American rights, and the American dream! #america #undefeated #justice4jerry Duane EndresTHE JERRY COX STORY rneodtSops07i ulctc481u07am38m3r6na0l20i5lJuh4t9hu2y349lhfaa   Update: As of today, all the “rats have jumped ship” but, Our county lawyer in the bottom-right corner along with his “Policing for Profit” Silver & Wright lawyers on top! Here you see in the middle one of their “images used on their brochures” where they present & coach County Government officials on how… Read More

4/14/2023 the US Supreme Court Conference Decides the Future US Judicial System by Deciding this Petition

April 14 is a day of monumental decision for the US Supreme Court: (1) do the justices uphold the 14th Amendment, Supreme Court precedents of over 200 years and the codes of conduct and penal codes by reversing the California Supreme Court and voiding all decisions by state judges and justices who accepted illegal payments from counties or trial courts when they were California State trial court judges; or (2) violate all of the above by denying the unopposed Petition. A denial will effectively destroy the integrity, functioning and respect for the U.S. Judicial System. READ THE PETITION HERE   MORE ON DR. RICHARD I. FINE AND AMEND SBX 2 11 What is Wrong with the County Payments to Judges? TODAY OUR CHOICE IS: (1) VOTE “NO”; or (2) CONTINUE TO LIVE UNDER A CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM! The Dirty Truth Behind California’s $400 Million of “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” The Campaign for Judicial Integrity Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE SBX 2 11 gave retroactive immunity from California criminal prosecution, civil liability and disciplinary action to… Read More

Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE

Richard I Fine Petition to the Supreme Court of California For A Writ Of Certiorari

“Richard I. Fine Presents the argument against paying County or Court Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments to Judges, to the US Supreme Court.” ========================================================================================= In The Supreme Court of the United States ——————————— ♦ ——————————— CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner, vs. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ——————————— ♦ ——————————— On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of California ——————————— ♦ ——————————— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ——————————— ♦ ——————————— RICHARD ISAAC FINE, ESQ. P.O. Box 789, 1187 Coast Village Rd., Ste. 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93102-0789 Telephone: (310) 622-6900 Email: richardfine@richardfinelaw.com Counsel for Petitioner Carol Pulliam ================================================================================================== COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Do state court trial judges, court of appeal justices and supreme court justices “war against the (United States) Constitution” by denying state litigants Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional due process when each and/or all these judicial officers did not disclose and recuse themselves as required by state law, state Code of Judicial Ethics and/or other state or federal requirements when he/she: (1) currently receives or in the past received payments from: (a) the county currently paying or paid the Respondent for Respondent’s services; and/or… Read More

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM HARMING CHILDREN, DENYING DUE PROCESS & VIOLATING OF CIVIL RIGHTS

Expose Santa Barbara County California Judge Donna D Geck

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM DENYING DUE PROCESS Fit mother denied any contact for over 600 days with her 5-year-old twins, violating civil rights under the color of law, placing children with a Father with a prior murder conviction, 5 DUI arrests, history of domestic violence with 3 counts of battery charges. This is a Call to Action to remove Judge Donna D. Geck from the bench of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court, as she is harming children and denying due process. Judge Donna D. Geck is a Judicial Officer for the Anacapa Division, Santa Barbara, California, who has a plethora of complaints against her rulings in the cases she oversees: Civil, Criminal, Family Law, Juvenile, Probate, Appeals, and Small Claims. The 3-year-old twins (now 5) were placed in full custody of the father when the mother requested permission from the court to move with the children to the next county 30 miles away. Judge Geck did not grant the move away. Judge Geck had full knowledge of the father’s criminal history when she placed the children with the father full time. Judge Geck then denied an evidentiary… Read More